An Analysis of Figurative Language in Eleven Stories by Leo Tolstoy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33772/elite.v2i2.1021Keywords:
Figurative Language, Short StoryAbstract
This study aims to find out the types of figurative language and the most dominant types of figurative language that used in short stories God Sees the Truth but Waits, Esarhaddon, King of Assyria, and Too Dear by Leo Tolstoy. The methodology of this study used descriptive qualitative method because the data are in form of words and utterance rather than the number. The source of data in this study is three short stories of Leo Tolstoy that taken from storage.cloversites.com. Some techniques in analyzing the data consist of classifying the data that need to be analyzed described the data and interpreting the data based on Leech’s categories and the last made the conclusion to answer the research question. This study used the theory of figurative language based on Geoffrey Leech’s categories. Based on the findings, there are four types of figurative language that was found in the short stories, they are hyperbole (5 data), metaphor (2 data), Litotes (2 data), and Simile (10 data). The most dominant figurative language used is a simile for 10 data.
References
-----. 1999. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Australia, Canada, Mexico, Singapore, and the United Kingdom
States: Heinle & Heinle.
Ary, Jacobs, Razavieh, and Chris Sorensen. 2006. Introduction to Research in Education. Sydney:
Thomson.
Dancygier, Barbara and Sweetser, Eve. 2014. Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Fadaee, Elaheh. (February, 2010). Symbols, Metaphors & Simile in Literature: A Case Study of Animal Farm. E. Journal. 2(2): 19-27. Retrieved: May 17th, 2013.
From web: http://www.academicjournals.org/ijel.
Finegan, Edward. 2012. Language: Its Structure and Use, 6th ed. Wadsworth.
Fraenkell, Jack. R and Wallen, Norman. G. (1993). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education,2nd Ed. New York: Mc, Graw-Hill International Edition.
Griffiths, Patrick. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2006. The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd Ed). New York: Longman Publishing.
Kennedy, X.J. 1983. Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry and Drama. Toronto: Little Brown Company.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1969. A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. New York: Longman Inc.
-----. 1981. Semantics: The Study of Meaning, 2nd Edition. London: Penguin Book.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics Volume I. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Maclin, Alice. 1992. A Handbook of English as a Second Language. Washington, D.C. CBS. College Publishing.
Murfin, Ross and Ray, Supryia M. 2003. The Bedford Glossary of Critical and Literary Terms. Boston: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nasr, Raja T. 1984. The Essentials of Linguistic Science: Selected and Simplified Reading. Harlow: Longman.
Palmer. 1981. Semantics. Sydney: Cambridge University Press.
Perrine, Laurence. 1987. Sound and Sense: An Introduction to Poetry, 7th Ed. Australia. Harcourt Publishers Group Pty. Ltd.
Robins, Robert H. General Linguistics: An Introductory Survey, 4th ed. London: Longman Publisher.
Rozakis, Laurie. E. 1995. How to Interpret Poetry. New York: A Simon & Schuster Macmillan Company.
Saeed, John I. 1997. Introducing Linguistics: Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sudaryat, yayat. 2009. Makna dalam Wacana. Bandung: CV Yrama Widya.
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 1977. Introduction to Linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 ELITE: Journal of English Language and Literature

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.