Affective Meaning in "The Kissing Booth" Movie Script Movie
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33772/elite.v4i1.1140Keywords:
Affective meaning, The Kissing Booth, movie script, Positive Affective Meaning, Negative Affective MeaningAbstract
This study aims to analyze “The Kissing Booth movie script†in terms of semantic study. The research question of this study is “How is Affective meaning used in The Kissing Booth Movie Script by Beth Reekles?â€. The objective of this study is to describe affective meaning is used in ‘The Kissing Booth’ Movie Script by Beth Reekles. The source of data is taken from the movie script by Beth Reekles. This study uses the descriptive qualitative method. The data are collected by searching and downloading, watching the movie, reading the script, classifying, and coding the data. Based on the analysis the writer finds affective meaning such as positive and negative affective meaning. Positive affective meaning consists of three data was (happy data 1 and 2, flattered data 3) and negative affective meaning consists of 12 data that are (angry data 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, shocked data 8 and 13, disappointed data 7 and 14, unhappy data 10, sad data15). The most dominant implication in the movie script objects is the emotion of negative affective meaning. The use of affective meaning depends on the context of the situation that occurs when the utterances stated.
References
Bloomfield, L. 1993. Language. New York: Henry Holt.
Braisby, N.R. 1990. Situating Word Meaning. Amsterdam: University Press.
Bodgan, Robert &Biklen. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston London.
Cruse, Alan. 2011. Meaning in Language: An Introduction Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Investigation in Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ermiani. 2018. Analysis Affective Meaning in Adele’s Song Lyrics. Universitas Halu Oleo.
Dey, Ian. 1993. Qualitative Data Analysis (A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientist). London: New Fetter Lane.
Firth, J. 2006. Theories of Personality. United States: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Fillenbaum and Rapoport. 1971. Structure in The Subjective Lexicon. New York: Academic Press.
Genter,d&Borodutsky, L. 2001. Individuation, Relativity and Early Word Learning. New York: University Press.
Holmes, Janet. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Longman.
Husni, Apriliyany. 2018. An Analysis of Affective Meaning in New Yorkers. Universitas Halu Oleo.
Leech, G. 1991. The states of the Art in Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman.
Leech, G. 1974. Semantics. New York, U.S.A: Penguin.
Leech, G. 1981. Semantics: The Study of Meaning. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge University.
Matthews, K.A. 2003. Development of the Cognitive Appraisal and Understanding of Social Events.San Diego States University.
Mildred, Larson. 1984. Meaning Based Translation: A Guide to Cross-Language Equivalence. Lanham: University Press of Amerika.
Patrick, Griffiths. 2006. An Introduction Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh University Press.
Rijhkof. 2002. The Noun Phrase (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford University Press.
Thompson, Geof. 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar. Great Britain: Abingdon.
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 1997. An Introduction Sociolinguistics. United Kingdom: Blackwell Textbooks.
Wiersma, W. 1995.Research Methods in Education An Introduction. Boston Allyn& Bacon.
Yule, George. 2010. The study of Language. Academia: University Press.
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics, Introduction to Language Study. New York: Oxford University Press.
Website
https://en.m.wikepedia.org./wiki/The-Kissing-Booth.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 ELITE: Journal of English Language and Literature
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
