Deontic Modality in "The Invisible Man" Movie (A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective)

Authors

  • Dian Arnhy Muhtar
  • Neil Amstrong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33772/elite.v8i1.2271

Keywords:

commissive, deontic modality, directive, movie, volitive

Abstract

This research discusses the aspects of action and speech that are contained in The Invisible Man movie based on the theory of Jespersen and Palmer (2007) in the sub-categories commissive, directive, and volitive. The objective of this research is to describe deontic modality in three sub-categories commissive, directive, and volitive in The Invisible Man movie. This research used the descriptive qualitative method. The sources of data of this research are audio visual as primary data and written utterances from screenshotting and transcribing as secondary data. The data is from The Invisible Man movie. Data collection was carried out by searching and downloading movies, watching movies, screenshotting, classifying, and coding. Data were analyzed by presenting, describing, interpreting, and concluding data to answer research questions from this research. The results show that 18 data are included in the sub-categories commissive, directive, and volitive. Deontic modality appears because it is made by several characters in the movie that make promises and threats (commissive), make requests, order others to do something, give suggestions, carry out obligations (directive), and hope for something (volitive). The researcher found that the characters in The Invisible Man movie adopt deontic modality aspects that focus on the sub-categories commissive, directive, and volitive modality because many scenes show how aspects of the three sub-categories are used by characters to overcome existing problems. These three sub-categories are related to each other, the existence of a commissive that will lead to the directive to volitive.

 

References

Charlow, N. & Chrisman, M. 2016. Deontic Modality. Oxford Scholarship Online.

Chrisman, M. 2012. On the Meaning Ought. In Oxford Studies in Metaethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 7: 304 - 32.

Chrisman, M. 2015. The Meaning of Ought Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Chrisman, M. 2016. Metanormative Theory and the Meaning of Deontic Modals. Oxford Scholarship Online, 1 - 13.

Griffiths, P. 2006. Modality. In P. Griffiths, An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Gultom, E. (2023). The Sustainable Tourism of Lumban Suhi - Suhi Village Samosir After the Pandemic. Humaniora. Vol.35, No 1 (2023). Universitas Gajah Mada. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.80315

Jespersen. 2007. The Author Perspective Model for Classifying Deontic Modality Event. Central Expressway, Suite.

Litowitz, B. 2005. The Origins of Ethics: Deontic Modality. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies.

Palmer, F.R. 1990. Modality and the English Modals. Second edition. London: Longman.

Palmer, F.R. 2001. Mood and Modality. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pathak, V., Jena, B. & Karla, S. 2013. Qualitative Research. Perspect Clin Res, 4 (3):192

Portner, P. 2008. Modality. USA: Georgetown University.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-20

How to Cite

Muhtar, Dian Arnhy, and Neil Amstrong. 2023. “Deontic Modality in "The Invisible Man&Quot; Movie (A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective)”. ELITE: Journal of English Language and Literature 8 (1):26-35. https://doi.org/10.33772/elite.v8i1.2271.

Issue

Section

Vol. 8 No. 1 June 2023

Most read articles by the same author(s)