This research investigates a tragic murder case from Knives Out movie of Harlan Thrombey case Fran was a servant in the Thrombey Family, and the investigator immediately investigated the case and emphasized the outline of the law, language, and criminal cases in the field of forensic linguistics. This research aimed to describe Police speak and Narrative Storytelling in Knives Out Movie Script (A Forensic Linguistic Perspective). The method used descriptive qualitative, the data was taken from the movie script and then collects every discovery through any existing data and analyzed by interpreting and describing the data. This result was to focus on how the police speak and narrative storytelling depicted in the movie “Knives Out 2019” by “Rian Johnson” was focused in terms of its forensic linguistics. In many investigative languages that have not been revealed by the investigator in their interviews with each of the witnesses. This research describes the context of the data using Narrative and Storytelling and also how police detectives interview witnesses using Policespeak, including control over topic and interactional focus, establish motive, establish knowledge, rapport building, and control of topic navigation by interpreting and describing data using police speak and narrative storytelling theory to reveal the language of the police investigation. From the findings that Harlan Thrombey found died cause he was suicide, Harlan took the knife to kill himself however Harlan knew about which one will kill him by criminal, someone changed his morphine into overdoses and that was Ransom, his nephew.
Investigative Language, Narrative Storytelling, Police speak
Aitken, C. 1995 Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, Chichester: John Wiley.
Alexander. Y. Aikhenvald.1998 “Evidentials and areal typology:a case study from Amazonia”. Language Sciences. Academic Press
Barcelona. 2005. IAFL Conference on Forensic Linguistics/Language and the Law. Universitas Pompeu Fabra.
Chafe. W. 1986. “A psychological account of the development and use of evidential in Turkish In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood: Ablex.
Cotterill, J. ed. 2002 Language in the Legal Process, London: Palgrave.
Coulthard, M. and Johnson, A. 2007. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London/New York: Routledge.
Gibbons. J. 1994. Language and the Law, London: Longman
Goutsos. D. 1995. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law (formerly Forensic Linguistics). London
Hill. J.H. 1992. “The grammaticization of responsibility and evidence: interactional manipulation of evidential categories in Newari”, in Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Janet. Barnes. 1984. “Evidentials in the Tuyuca verb”. International Journal of American Linguistics. Cambridge University Press America.
Lloyd. B. Anderson.1986. “Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: typologically regular assume-tries”, In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood: Ablex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McMenamin, G. 1993. Forensic Stylistics, International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law (formerly Forensic Linguistics). London
McMenamin.Gerald R. 2004. Olson's book (Forensic Linguistics) ‘Author identiﬁcation, idiolect and linguistic uniqueness’, Applied Linguistics, 25(4): 431–47. CRC press
Moore, A (1999). Academy Style Guide, Arcadia Press
Pozzo. B. 2005. Ordinary meaning in legal interpretation’, in Pohjois-SuomenTuomarikoulu; reprinted in Ordinary Language and Legal Language. Milan
Simpson. O.J. 2003. Language and Power in Court: A linguistic analysis of the trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
W.M. O’Barr. 1982. Linguistic Evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.