Semiotika dalam Kumpulan Puisi “Les Lettre D’amour À George Sand” Karya Alfred De Musset

Authors

  • Jumiyarni Halu Oleo University
  • Yuli Mahmudah Sentana Halu Oleo University
  • Samsul Halu Oleo University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33772/leparis.v5i1.2420

Keywords:

Romanticism, semiotics, Roland Barthes, Alfred de Musset

Abstract

Romanticism was a literary and artistic movement that developed in the first half of the 19th century as a reaction to the classical orderliness and rationalism of previous centuries. In order to analyze the romanticism in the poetry collection Les Lettre D'amour À George Sand, the meaning in this poem is studied first using Roland Barthes' semiotic theory. Romanticism is analyzed using Nicole Masson's theory of romanticism, namely Liberté, Émotion, Le Moi, Évasion, and Renouvellement de langue. The method used is a qualitative descriptive method, namely describing data in sentence form. The data collection technique is carried out by reading, noting important parts, and grouping the data that has been identified. The data analysis technique is carried out by classifying data, interpreting data, analyzing data, then concluding the data that has been analyzed. The results of the research show a form of
adoration, disappointment and sincerity directed by the author towards his lover. Based on the meaning that has been found, it shows that the poetry collection Les Lettre D'amour À George Sand contains characteristics of the romantic school. This can be seen from the free form and themes of poetry, the content of poetry which focuses on the author's emotions. A combination of two different times written in beautiful and interesting language.

Author Biography

  • Jumiyarni, Halu Oleo University

    Jurusan Bahasa dan Sastra

References

Barthes, Roland. 1974. S/Z. Terjemahan bahasa inggris oleh Richard Miller.

Britain: Brasil Blackwell.

Culler, Jonathan. 2003. Barthes. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Jendela.

Faruk. (2017). Metode Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hudson dalam Aminuddin. 2009. Pengertian Puisi.

https://www.matrapendidikan.com/2016/11pengertian-puisi-menurut-para-ahli.html?=1. Diakses pada tanggal 31 januari 2023.

Krech, David Dan Richard S. Crutchfield. 1969. Elements of Psychology. New

York: Second Edition, Alfred A, Koph, Inch.

Kurniawan. 2001. Semiologi Roland Barthes. Magelang: Yayasan Indonesia

Margareta, Shinta. 2013. Hubungan Pelaksanaan Sistem Kearsipan Dalam

Efektivitas Pengambilan Keputusan Pimpinan.

https://repository.upi.edu/1605/6/S_ADP_0705056_Chapter3.pdf. Diakses

pada tanggal 6 februari 2023.

Selden, Raman. 1993. Panduan Pembaca Teori Sastra Masa Kini. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press (diterjemahkan oleh

Rachmat Djoko Pradopo)

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta cv.

Sunardi. 2002. Semiotika Negativa. Yogyakarta: Kanal

Sumardjo, Jacob dan Saini. 1997. Apresiasi Kesusastraan. Jakarta: Gramedia

Pustaka Utama.

Pradopo, Rachmat Djoko. 2009. Pengkajian Puisi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada

University Press.

Waluyo. 1995. Jenis-jenis Puisi.

http://repository.ump.ac.id/5798/3/MARIA%20ULFA%20BAB%20II.pdf.

Diakses pada tanggal 31 januari 2023.

Wellek, Renne, Dan Austin Warren. 1990. Teori Kesusastraan (Diterjemahkan oleh Melani Budianta). Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Yasmin, Tsuroyya. 2020. Bagaimana Konsep Mengenai Hakikat Sastra?.

https://www.dictio.id/t/bagaimana-konsep-mengenai-hakikat-sastra/124281. Diakses pada tanggal 3 februari 2023.

Zakky. 2018. Pengertian Puisi Menurut Para Ahli dan Defenisi Puisi Secara

Umum.https://www.zonareferensi.com/pengertian-puisi/. Diakses pada

tanggal 6 februari 2023.

Zulfahnur, dkk. 1996. Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-28

Issue

Section

Volume 5 Issue 1, March 2024