DISTRIBUTION OF FORTRESS IN CENTRAL BUTON DISTRICT, SOUTH EAST SULAWESI PROVINCE

Authors

  • Ade Trie Yunizar Archaeology, Halu Oleo University
  • sitti kasmiati Archaeology, Halu Oleo University
  • sandy suseno Archaeology, Halu Oleo University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33772/sangia.v2i1.570

Keywords:

Central Buton, Enviromental Resources

Abstract

This study aimed to discover and describe the remaining archeology which is a fortress at central Butondistrict, the spread of the fortress that exist and factors affects the spread of the fortress. This study usedinductive reasoning method which is a study based on observation until the conclusion with technique ofcollecting the data which consisted of observation, interview, and literature review, and data analysis used spatialand contextual analysis.The result showed that at central Buton district there was remaining archeology which isa spread fortress that formed a four spread of fortress. The spread I consisted of a fortress built in group in thesame area meanwhile spread II, III and IV were built in three different areas. The construction of fortresses wasaffected from few factors that were physical environmental factosuch as topography, altitude, soil type and goodhydrology gave the construction of the fortress at ease, and could fulfill the needs of the people who live in thefortress and facilitate the safety if natural disasters occur.Then the other environmental factors were the locationof the fortress which in general was located in thecoastal area, though it was located in the hilly area but thelocation of the fortress could monitor territorial waters.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Anceaux, J.C., 1987. Wolio Dictionary (Wolio-English-Indonesian). Foris Publications Holland :Dordrecht-Holland/Providence-U.S.A.

Alifah. 2017. Pemanfaatan Analisis Phytoliyh dan Starch Dalam Studi arkeologi Lingkungan.Yogyakarta : Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta

Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. 2009.Laporan PenelitianBentengWabula. Makassar : Balai arkeologi Makasasar.

Hazim, Nur Kholif. 2004.Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Surabaya : Terbit Terang.

Mansyur, Syahruddin. 2006. “Studi Keruangan Dalam Arkeologi : Prospek Penelitiaannya di Malukudan Maluku Utara”.Kapata Arkeologi Vol 2 No 2 hal 105-125. Ambon : Balai Arkeologi Ambon.

Muhaeminah dkk. 1998.Survei Benteng-Benteng Kuna di Kecamatan Lasalimu, Kab. Buton, SulawesiTenggara.Ujung Pandang : Balai Arkeologi Ujung Pandang.

Mundardjito. 1986. Penalaran Induktif-Deduktif Dalam Penelitian Arkeologi di Indonesia dalamPertemuan Ilmiah Arkeologi IV 1986. Jakarta: Dept. Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

---------------. 1990.Metode Penelitian Pemukiman Arkeologis Dalam Monumen Karya PersembahanUntuk Prof. Dr. Soekmono.Depok : Fakultas Sastra UI.

---------------. 1995. “Kajian Kawasan : Pendekatan Strategis Dalam PenelitianArkeologi Di IndonesiaDewasa Ini”.Berkala Arkeologi Tahun XV EdisiKhusus. Yogyakarta : Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta.hal 24-27.

Sarjiyanto, 1999. “Eksistensi Kerajaan Buton : Kajian Benteng-Benteng Masa Kesultanan”.Walannae3/I 97-106.

Sukendar, Haris. 1999.Metode Penelitian Arkeologi. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi.

--------------------. 2008.Metode Penelitian Arkeologi. Jakarta : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi.

Zahari, A. M. 1974. “Sejarah dan Adat Fiy Darul Butuni”. Arsip/Ekspedisi : I.S.J HIT IPEUW

Published

2018-06-28

How to Cite

Yunizar, A. T., kasmiati, sitti and suseno, sandy (2018) “DISTRIBUTION OF FORTRESS IN CENTRAL BUTON DISTRICT, SOUTH EAST SULAWESI PROVINCE”, SANGIA JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY RESEARCH. Kendari, Indonesia, 2(1), pp. 56–72. doi: 10.33772/sangia.v2i1.570.

Issue

Section

Volume 2, Nomor 1, Juni 2018

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>